Transactions in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Transactions in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Study of all possible interactions in the quantum three-body problem with Calogero-Sutherland Hamiltonian

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
A. Latifi
H. Rahmati
Qom University of Technology
10.30511/ttmp.2024.2027905.1026
Abstract
In the quantum three-body problem, There are three possible models: 1. Each particle interacts independently with the two others, forming three interacting pairs. Pairwise interactions refer to this model. 2. Each particle interacts with the centre of mass of the two others, called the pure three-body interaction. 3. Each particle interacts simultaneously with the two others and with the centre of mass of the two others. This latest is called the full-three-body interaction, which combines pairwise and pure three-body interactions. Therefore, knowing which of these models prevails in a given physical context is essential. In this paper, we choose the integrable Calogero Sutherland Hamiltonian, and we explicitly write the wave functions of the ground states in each of these modellings for three fermions and three bosons on a ring. These wave functions reveal regions of the null or quasi-null probability of the presence of particles. This theoretical distribution of probability is to be compared with observations to discover which of these models prevails in the observed physical context. As a physical context, we suggest cold atoms ring-shaped optical lattices. In addition, we clarify several points about the relation between trigonometric and inverse square interactions on a line and a ring.
Keywords
Three-body quantum Problem
two-body interactions
Calogero-Sutherland Hamiltonian
threebody interactions
ring-shaped optical
Subjects
1. S. Erkoç, Ann. Rev. Comput. Phys. IX 1, 1 (2001)#

2. S. Surulere, M. Shatalov, A. Mkolesia, J. Ehigie, Int. J. Math. Mod. Num. Opt. 10, (2020)#

3. D. Tranh, V. Hoang, T. Hanh, Physica B. 608 (2021)#

4. L. Pizzagalli, J. Godet, J. Guénolé, S. Brochar, E. Holmstrom, K. Nordlund, T. A. J. Albaret, J. Phys.. 25, 1 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1088/09538984/25/5/055801#

5. J. Holt, M. Kawaguchi, N. Kaiser, Front. Phys. 8 (2020)#

6. K. Vacek, A. Okiji, N. Kawakami, Eigenfunctions for SU(N) particles with 1/r2 interaction in harmonic confinement (IOP Publishing, 1994)#

7. K. Sogo, J. Phys. Soc. Japan. 65 (1996)#

8. F. Calogero, C. Marchioro, J. Math. Phy. 15 (1974)#

9. M. Rosenbaum, A. Turbiner, A. Capella, Inter. J. Modern Phy. A 13 (1998)#

10. C. Quesne, Phys. Rev. A. 55, 5 (1997)#

11. W. Ruhl, A. Turbiner, Mod. Phys. Lett. A. 10 (1995)#

12. H. Rahmati, A. Latifi, Few-Body Syst. 60 (2019)#

13. M. A. Olshanetsky J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 12
(2005)#
14. A. Polychronakos, The physics and mathematics of Calogero particles (IOP Publishing, 2006)#

15. G. Gibbons, P. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 454 (1999)#

16. Y. Yu, W. Zheng, Z. Zhu, Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997)#

17. L. Amico, A. Osterloh, F. Cataliotti, Phys. Rev. Lett.. 95, 8 (2005)#

18. Y. Yu, Z. Luo, Z. Wang, J Phys Condens Matter26 (2014)#

19. J. Y. Choi, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 82 (2023)#

20. B. Sutherland, J. Mathe. Phys.. 12 (1971)#

21. B. Sutherland, Phys. Rev. A 4, 11 (1971)#

22. J. Wolfes, J. Math. Phys.. 15 (1974)#

23. B. Sutherland, Phys. Rev. A 5, 3 (1972)#

24. L. Lapointe, P. Mathieu, Sym. Integr. Geo. meth. Appl. 11 (2015)#

25. F. Lesage, V. Pasquier, D. Serban, Nuc. Phys. B 435 (1995)#
 
Transactions in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Volume 1, Issue 2
Spring 2024
Pages 59-67

  • Receive Date 01 May 2024
  • Revise Date 27 May 2024
  • Accept Date 30 May 2024
  • First Publish Date 30 May 2024
  • Publish Date 01 May 2024